from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2irvxOu
via IFTTT
Thursday, 30 November 2017
Wednesday, 29 November 2017
Letter To Taxi Leaks : Uber Breach Of Data : Andrew Peters Secretary GMB Brighton & Hove Taxi Section
Simon Court
Senior Solicitor
Brighton & Hove Council
Town Hall
Norton Road
Hove
November 25 2017
Dear Mr Court
Uber Breach of Data
I write to you with reference to the serious matter of Uber concealing a breach of data and the councils continuous support of Uber being ‘Fit and Proper’ to hold a Brighton & Hove Operators licence.
Reports have stated that some 57 million account holders and some 600,000 driver details were stolen in 2016 .
It is one matter having such a breach of security in the first place but it is an entirely different matter that such a serious breach in 2016 was never revealed to the public or regulators until one year later in November 2017 when it was revealed that it had paid 'hush money' to the hackers.
When it is considered that Fred Jones of Uber immediately ‘reached out’ to the public to condemn TfL and the Mayor of London Sadiq Khan for refusing to re-licence Uber and yet remained absolutely silent with no warning to the public when data was stolen... such inaction can clearly demonstrate the fitness of an organisation that is fully supported by the council.
It is presumed that Mr Fred Jones gave no indication to the council that Uber tried to hide this serious data breach when applying for the renewal of the Uber Brighton & Hove Operators Licence when presenting the company as ‘Fit Proper’ to hold such a licence.
TfL Investigation
We have since learnt that TfL are now involved in the investigation and on the principle that Brighton & Hove Council Hove have based the recent re-licensing of Uber on how TfL are managing the refusal of the Uber London Licence we now call on Brighton & Hove Council to act in the same way as TfL and carry out its own investigation into the breach of data and the implications of Uber remaining silent about this for over a year.
We also require the council to justify to the trade that it still considers Uber to be ‘Fit and Proper’ to hold a Brighton & Hove Operators Licence.
For clarity:
Evening Standard - TfL investigates whether massive Uber cyber attack impacted Londoners
“The ride-hailing firm admitted this week to concealing a cyber-attack that affected 57 million customers and drivers last year.
Security services and the information watchdog were left scrabbling to assess the scale of the damage on Tuesday, amid warnings Uber's secrecy could result in "higher fines".
The firm hid the breach by reportedly paying hackers a ransom of £75,000 ($100,000) to delete the data and keep the security lapse quiet.
While Uber said it could not confirm how many customers in the UK had their details compromised, TfL said they are working to establish whether the hack affected Londoners. A TfL spokesman said: “We are working to gain clarity from Uber on whether any of the issues seen in the US have occurred here.
“We are pressing them for the full details of what has happened so that we can be satisfied that all the right protections are in place for the personal data of drivers and customers in London.”
Stolen information included names, email addresses and mobile phone numbers, in addition to the names and number plates of 600,000 drivers in the US
Prime Minister Theresa May's official spokesman said: "These are obviously concerning reports and the National Cyber Security Centre is working closely with domestic and international agencies, including the National Crime Agency and the Information Commissioner's Office, to investigate if and how this breach has affected people in the UK. "It is a worldwide incident and it is unclear at this stage which countries were affected by the hack.
"What we do know is, based on current information, we have not seen evidence that financial details have been compromised." He added that Uber "did not notify individuals in the UK, the UK Government or UK regulators" at the time the hack was discovered in October last year.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) warned Uber it could face fines, saying the incident raised "huge concerns around its data protection policies and ethics". The tech company reportedly tracked down the hackers and pressured them to sign non-disclosure agreements so news of the incident did not become public.
Company executives had then dressed up the breach as a "bug bounty", the practice of paying hackers to test the strength of software security, according to The New York Times. James Dipple-Johnstone, deputy commissioner of the information watchdog, said: "Uber's announcement about a concealed data breach last October raises huge concerns around its data protection policies and ethics.
"It's always the company's responsibility to identify when UK citizens have been affected as part of a data breach and take steps to reduce any harm to consumers.
"If UK citizens were affected then we should have been notified so that we could assess and verify the impact on people whose data was exposed.
He added: "Deliberately concealing breaches from regulators and citizens could attract higher fines for companies."
http://ift.tt/2Ao37MX
Please note that I have supplied a copy of this email to various organisations...publications ....individuals and interested parties and with respect your reply will be made publically available unless you specifically refuse permission.
I look forward to your early reply on such an important matter.
Andrew Peters
Secretary
GMB Brighton & Hove Taxi Section
from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2ndwyeY
via IFTTT
Uber's Data Hack Affects 2.7m Of Their Customers, Not For The First Time.
Uber's Data Hack, Has Affected 2.7m Of Their Customers And Also Their Drivers.
In October 2016, Uber experienced a data security incident that resulted in the hacking of information related to riders and drivers accounts.
For riders, this information included the names, email addresses and mobile phone numbers related to accounts globally.
For riders, this information included the names, email addresses and mobile phone numbers related to accounts globally.
Uber said their outside forensics experts have not seen any indication that trip location history, credit card numbers, bank account numbers or dates of birth were downloaded, but customers have been all over social media, saying they've been charged for expensive journeys they never booked.
This is a global issue, but in the United Kingdom alone, this involves approximately 2.7m riders and drivers.
This is a global issue, but in the United Kingdom alone, this involves approximately 2.7m riders and drivers.
Uber again say this is an approximation rather than an accurate and definitive count, because sometimes the information we get through the app or our website that we use to assign a country code is not the same as the country where a person actually lives.
Again proof that this company takes little regard of complaints made on Twitter or Facebook. As they don't have a complaints land line number (a requirement for operators, under the PHV act 1998) this would be the majority of camp,aunts made.
When this happened, we took immediate steps to secure the data, shut down further unauthorised access, and strengthen our data security.
When this happened, we took immediate steps to secure the data, shut down further unauthorised access, and strengthen our data security.
They also decided to say nothing to regulators or customers and have Bly spoken now as this breach has been publicly exposed.
DO I NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION?
Best advice to customers is to delete their account and contact their bank, informing them not to pay any Uber trips charged to their account.
Uber have made a statement that they encourage all users to regularly monitor their accounts for any issues.
DO I NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION?
Best advice to customers is to delete their account and contact their bank, informing them not to pay any Uber trips charged to their account.
Uber have made a statement that they encourage all users to regularly monitor their accounts for any issues.
They say customers should let them know via the Help Centre if anything unexpected or unusual related to your Uber account. You can do this by tapping "Help" in your app, then "Account and Payment Options" > "I have an unknown charge" > "I think my account has been hacked".
Funny they should put this out after stating that no customers (to their knowledge) have been hacked!
It also appears that their own drivers are now complaining that money has been taken from their accounts!
It also appears that their own drivers are now complaining that money has been taken from their accounts!
NCSC advice for Uber customers and drivers
The NCSC has also provides guidance which can be found below..
Mayor Khan has turned a blind eye to all the scandal that's hit the media over the past few weeks. The rise in UberRape, the escalation of road traffic accidents, the allegations of industrial espionage of competitors and the Data hacking.
Khan made his feelings about Uber clear in the Osbourne's Evening Standard
THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME UBERS CUSTOMER SERVERS HAVE BEEN HACKED !
In addition to failing to notify users and the public about the information that was exposed, the company paid the hackers $100,000 to delete the data and subsequently had them sign nondisclosure agreements. The city further alleges that the ride-hail company failed to correct security vulnerabilities that led to a previous data breach in 2014.
The complaint reads:
from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2j1Kd4b
via IFTTT
Tuesday, 28 November 2017
Uber’s Claim That Hackers Have Fully Deleted Stolen Data Is “Nonsensical”
Uber's been sued at least 11 times in just 1 week, faces new scrutiny from Senate.
It’s now been a full week since the jaw-dropping revelations that Uber sustained a massive data breach in 2016, which affected over 57 million people.
Since November 21, the company has been hit with 10 federal lawsuits (including the two Ars reported on last week). On Monday, the City of Chicago and Cook County also sued Uber in Illinois state court, while numerous senators are now demanding answers as well.
The cases allege substantial negligence on Uber’s part: plaintiffs say the company failed to keep safe the data of the affected 50 million customers and 7 million drivers.
Uber reportedly paid $100,000 to delete the stolen data and tried to keep news of the breach quiet by having the hackers sign non-disclosure agreements.
In the case of City of Chicago v. Uber, city and Cook County lawyers wrote that in October 2016, then-CEO Travis Kalanick was contacted by two hackers who claimed to have millions of individual Uber customers’ records.
"In striking resemblance to the 2014 breach, the hackers had accessed a private GitHub repository and found database login credentials," Chicago's attorneys argued.
"While the repository was password-protected, hackers were still able to breach it—indicating either a very weak password or the fact that the user credentials for the repository were found in a previous unrelated data breach. And even though Uber specifically promised regulators that it would use two-factor authentication on services like GitHub, it clearly failed to implement that promise. Once inside the GitHub repository, the attackers once again found AWS login credentials, which the attackers then used to access and extract the personal information of over 50 million people, including Chicago and Illinois residents."
Last Tuesday, CEO Dara Khosrowshahi wrote: "None of this should have happened, and I will not make excuses for it."
According to the Wall Street Journal, Khosrowshahi learned of the breach two weeks after he took over the company’s top job on September 6, and yet he kept quiet for over two months.
Chicago attorneys also wrote that the company’s claims that the stolen data has been fully expunged is "nonsensical."
"It has not demonstrated, in any way, how or why it knows the data was actually deleted," they wrote. "No matter what documents the hackers signed, or representations they made, Uber is saying little more than that they trust the word of criminals."
"Integrity"
The broadly-similar proposed 10 class-action suits were filed in several federal courts across the country: in San Francisco; Los Angeles; Allentown, Pennsylvania; Portland, Chicago; and even Huntsville, Alabama.
On Monday, a group of senators, lead by Sen. John Thune (R-South Dakota) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), specifically asked for a "detailed timeline" of the incident, among other demands due by December 11.
Similarly, Sen. Mark Warner (D-Virginia) also had an even more damning question.
"To the extent Uber had lawfully acquired information enabling it to identify the hackers who had compromised its systems, ensure they would abide by agreements to delete the data and not to disclose the breach, and transfer them $100,000, it conceivably had enough information at hand to assist law enforcement in the apprehension of these criminals," he wrote.
"Why did Uber choose not to provide relevant forensic information to law enforcement and has this information been provided to law enforcement in the last week?"
Uber spokeswoman Molly Spaeth sent a statement to other media, including the Chicago Tribune, which read: "We are committed to changing the way we do business, putting integrity at the core of every decision we make, and working hard to regain the trust of consumers."
Uber has not responded to Ars’ multiple requests for comment.
Source : ars technica
from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2ieiXlD
via IFTTT
TfL...Architects Of Their Own Demise : None So Blind As Those Who Will Not See.
There's and old saying, which has never been truer than today.....none so blind as those who will not see!
Instead of looking closer to home, as passengers choose Uber over buses and trains, TfL has put the blame of an unexpected fall in passenger numbers on .... Brexit.
TfL said:
We have seen lower growth in demand for our services than previously forecast for this year, largely owing to economic factors affecting the whole of the UK, including the uncertainty of Brexit.
Lower consumer confidence, GDP growth stagnating, real wage growth and a softening housing market are all affecting services and retail in London, leading to lower than forecast passenger numbers.
Current patterns in rail journeys show a year-on-year reduction in trips within Zone 1, which TfL said was reflected in its lower passenger income, and that the economic headaches had also buffeted its commercial revenue.
Operation Horizon back on the table.....
With Uber allegedly expanding its fleet of minicabs to over 40,000, plus private hire licenses dished out like sweets to all comers, TfL expect negative pressure on demand for London's public transport to continue for the first half of its five-year business plan.
The transport body's overall income for 2016/17 was £6.8bn, and for 2017/18 it is expected to drop to £6.5bn, while passenger income is expected to dip from £4.7bn for 2016/17 to £4.6bn for 2017/18.
TfL is also having to contend with the grant cut from central government. Its grant funding from the Department for Transport has been reduced by £2.8bn from 2015/16 to 2020/21.
Mayor Sadiq Khan said in the plan: "Our spending decisions become even more important in today's economic climate. While all other major transport operators in the world receive some form of central government subsidy, the government has taken £2.8bn away from TfL's operational funding."
TfL announced last month that upgrades for the Jubilee Line and Northern Line have been shelved after a surprise dip in passenger numbers on the Tube.
Out of desperation, TfL have flooded central London with an excess of buses, many remain empty most of the time, with the Tube the only part of the network still making a small profit. The transport body has been left facing an "investment prioritisation process".
The Mayor's fare freeze has had a major impact.
Critics have pointed their finger at mayor Sadiq Khan's fare freeze, with London Assembly Conservative member, Keith Prince, saying earlier this month: “In just 12 months, Sadiq Khan’s con of a ‘fares freeze’ has eluded millions of travelcard users and cost TfL hundreds of millions of pounds."
But in its business plan, TfL said early indications were that the fare freeze "has helped to dampen the effect of these negative economic factors". Putting up fares will encourage more people to Use cheaper services such as Uber.
Where fares have been increased on the National Rail network, this has led to "much sharper reductions in passenger numbers for those operators", TfL added.
TfL are hoping people will turn away from cars and Taxis. They are hoping to bring new passengers from outside London in on the Tube.
In their planned fight back, TfL have fully backed plans to disrupt surface transport with pedestrianisation of major streets in WI, unreasonably quick green light phasing, segregated cycle lane's congestion, numerous unmanned road works...etc, banking on the Elizabeth Line to bring a considerable much needed boost to their economy.
TfL also plan to ramp up income from commercial activities such as interactive advertising at bus stops as well as Tube and Coach Stations.
from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2zLdjPA
via IFTTT
Monday, 27 November 2017
#UberRape, Driver Sentencing Is Just The Latest Controversy For Company
Alejandro Done will serve up to 12 years in prison for raping a young female passenger.
Sebastian Murdock
A former Massachusetts Uber driver has been sentenced to 10 to 12 years in prison after raping a female passenger, adding to a growing list of Uber drivers accused of sexual assault.
Boston native Alejandro Done, 47, who pleaded guilty, was sentenced last Friday on charges including kidnapping, assault and battery, and aggravated rape, according to USA Today.
Ex-Uber driver Alejandro Done was sentenced to at least 10 years in prison for raping a female passenger.
On Dec. 6, 2014, Done picked up a woman heading to her home in Cambridge. Done told the woman that she would have to pay him in cash. The two went to an ATM to withdraw money, then Done drove her to a secluded location, reported the Star Tribune.
Done kept the victim trapped in the car as he strangled and sexually assaulted her.
The felon has previously been charged with five other unsolved sexual assaults that happened in the Boston area between 2006 and 2010. That case is still pending. Uber told USA Today that Done had passed a background check, and had no prior criminal record.
“The defendant preyed upon a young woman who trusted that he was who he portrayed himself to be,” District Attorney Marian Ryan said in a statement. “I encourage the public to take precautions when using any ride-sharing service.”
In another recent case, in South Carolina, a sixth-grade teacher, who was moonlighting as an Uber driver was arrested on charges of kidnapping and forcible rape. Patrick Aiello, 39, was accused of assaulting a 23-year-old woman in August. The woman managed to escape from the car and was struck by another one in the process. Aiello later pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges, and authorities dropped felony charges of kidnapping and criminal sexual assault against him, according to the Post and Courier.
A former Uber driver in India, Shiv Kumar Yadav, was convicted of raping a female passenger Tuesday.
Many states in the U.S. are demanding that Uber ensure its background checks are more thorough. Last year, prosecutors in California filed a complaint against the ride-hailing service for failing to adequately vet drivers, some of whom have been convicted sex offenders, kidnappers and murderers.
Last April, Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker proposed a bill giving his state oversight in background checks. Uber has backed the legislation proposal, and hosts a petition on its website in favor of the governor’s plan, which has more than 30,000 signatures.
Uber faces a litany of other problems. Last weekend, drivers called for a strike and demanded better pay and higher fares. The service has been suspended in Spain for creating unfair competition and it is banned in Italy for not adhering to licensing rules. French taxi drivers, who were upset by having to compete with Uber, took to the streets last summer, smashing cars and setting tires on fire.
from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2n7NMdo
via IFTTT
UberPool Car Sharing Banned From Operating In Israel From 10am Tomorrow
Uber will have to stop providing its car-sharing service in Israel as of 10 AM Wednesday, after the courts ruled in favor of competing companies. A Tel Aviv judge issued an injunction to that effect on Monday.
Judge Eitan Orenstein explained that because the drivers in question lacked appropriate insurance for passengers, he could not allow Uber to continue to operate run Uber Day and Uber Night ride-sharing services using private household cars in Israel.
The Uber taxi service, however, may continue, the judge ruled.
Uber had been successfully sued by an Isreally Taxi drivers association. Separately, the Transportation Ministry sued Uber in May, on the grounds that Israeli regulation forbids taking passengers for money unless one has a taxi license. That case is still pending.
The ministry claims that not only the driver, but even passnengers are in violation of the law. In the suit they name Uber's local manager, Yoni Greifman, and six drivers as those who are accused of taking passengers for pay.
Uber began operating in Israel in late 2016, on a small pilot basis. It expanded its carpooling operations over a month ago despite objections from the government.
A source at the Transportation Ministry speaking on condition of anonymity told TheMarker, "Someone boarding an Uber car is a criminal - both driver and passenger."
"The ministry is conducting a legal petition against the company, and there is the possibilty of filing of an interim injunction against its activities and the opening of a full criminal proceeding. A criminal proceeding will be conducted against anyone who provides the service or is a passenger and against the company itself. The legal counsel of the transportation ministry is working with all the relevant parties to find the most appropriate path forward." the source said.
from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2zuTqrJ
via IFTTT
Saturday, 25 November 2017
Addison Lee Plying a For Hire At Evolution, While Taxis Are Turned Away By Parks Police.
Last Saturday night, we saw licensed Taxis without the Gett app being turned away from Battersea Park venue Evolution.
I had a booking to pick up a young lady at 01:00.
I got there a little early but my approach to the venue was blocked by a parks police officer, who told me that only Taxis with the Gett app on their phone....(notice he didn't say booking, just needed the app on their phone)...were being allowed to approach the entrance and form a rank outside the venue.
I had to park in the riverside car park some distance away.
While I waited there, I was approached by a number of people leaving the venue asking if I was for hire.
I decided to walk up and have a word with the Gett Marshal. He agreed that I could come in and pick up my booked job and spoke to the police on my behalf to let me through there picket.
This behaviour has upset many Taxi drivers who feel that Gett are stealing our work and then selling it back to drivers and have made their feelings clear, widely reporting on social media platforms.
In replies to complaints from drivers about the exclusion, it seems everyone has passed the buck.
The parks police said no cabs were turned away, the event management company said the exclusion was nothing to do with them and Gett said all the jobs were pre booked. This definitely was not the situation that I witnessed.
Well 'I was there' and I saw Taxis turned away, plus there appeared to be no advice about a Taxi rank in the other car park.
Gett also released this statement :
Now this week, the same is to happen again, this time using Addison Lee, who have made a statement that all jobs at Evolution will be pre-booked.
A friend of mine went there last night and spoke to the parks police who tried to get him to turn away by saying all the work was booked. Apparently they were being given a token which they could take to the car outside where they could take anyone of the cars who were ranking there, clearly plying for hire.
The constable said he could drive up and see, but he would be there a long time before he got a job.
This was not the case. He pulled up outside with his light on and within minutes got a £50 job to North Finchley.
So if you are passing Battersea Park tonight and fancy taking you chances at Evolution, don't let the park police turn you away as we've been told that the Taxi trade are not excluded from waiting outside for work.
from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2i2AzB3
via IFTTT
BBC London News Broadcast Another Slur On London's Iconic Taxi Trade.
Again we see more anti Taxi bias from a BBC London News reporter, in a broadcast made just yards away from the BBC In Portland Place, referring to the mysteriously hushed up Uber Attack on Exhibition Road, a Taxi incident.
2 minutes 10 seconds into the BBC broadcast below "Exhibition Road, where a TAXI mounted the pavement".
This is extreme bias and a slur on our iconic trade from the BBC, who refuse to accept there is a difference between Taxis and Private Hire.
This is completely unacceptable and complaints should be made on behalf of ever London Taxi drivers who feels slated by this unnecessary attack on our good name.
Coming just days after the media announcements that although serious sexual assault complaints in private hire vehicles had gone through the roof with the fact that last year, not one attack was reported to have taken place in a Licensed Taxi.
They keep getting away with this (even though our name is protected under government legislation), because it appears our representative orgs in the New United Trade group (LTDA, UCG, Unite and RMT) are weak and seem to have no plan, no idea what to do next.
So the ball is now in your court, and it's all up to you.
Get in contact with BBC London News and make it clear that you are not happy with the lazy journalism, resulting in constant slurs on our trades reputation.
Use the link below to contact BBC London News.
Also, still no word from the NUT group over the announcement of a major road closure in the Bank Junction vicinity, other than to announce the closure....value for money???
from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2BnwBb9
via IFTTT
Friday, 24 November 2017
Thursday, 23 November 2017
Taxi Trade Lied To Over Bank Junction Exclusion - Moorgate To Close For5 Months - New Ranks 🤗
Again we find out, the Taxi trade has been lied to over the Bank Junction...now there's a surprise!
When the trade met with the City of London earlier this year, they were given assurances the Bank Junction exclusion would only go ahead while there were no road closers in the surrounding areas.
Going by the notice issued yesterday by TfL, it looks like CoL have renaiged on their promise. Moorgate is to be closed off in both directions from South Place, to Lothbury (Bank Junction), for 5 months from Sunday 26th November till the1st of April next year, April fools day.
As far as we know, there has been no previous statement to trade orgs in regards to this closure.
The New United Trade group (NUT) pleaded with militant drivers to stop the driver lead, daily disruptive action at the Junction and promised that their team of observers would be keeping an eye on proceedings.
When Taxi Leaks phoned the LTDA office earlier today, they had no idea that Moorgate was being closed. Looks like they took their eye off the ball !!!
Will the City of London be announcing a lifting of the Bank Junction exclusion, while these road works take place......we wait with baited breath for their announcement.
And one from the NUTs wouldn't go amiss.
The Taxi Trade 'Winter Of Discontent' may well now be going ahead.
Other roads updates:
From this Sunday, again til April next year, Chelsea Embankment will be closed to all traffic westbound so that urgent gas works can be carried out.
Blackfriars bridge is to be closed to all traffic again this Friday night till Monday morning for resurfacing.
Also, please be careful at the lights, Buckingham Palace Road, junction of Terminus Place, where a new yellow box has been implemented.
Be advised that this will be heavily enforced with immediate effect.....unless you are driving a bus of course !!!
TAXI LEAKS EXTRA BIT :
At last, there is some good news... In the shape of new ranks.
The HardRock Cafe' now has a nice new rank outside, as does the Charlotte Street Hotel...and Ronnie Scott's, finally has a new rank.
The rank outside the W hote has been extended and Mahikis rank has been revised.
Please make sure you use the ranks and keep the touts off.
from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2mY8soc
via IFTTT
How is Uber still even in business at this point?
While no Silicon Valley company is without sin, Uber seems to have plumbed new depths of corporate depravity. There is so much fundamentally rotten at the company’s core that it’s nearly impossible to imagine that new-ish CEO Dara Khosrowshahi can disinfect and rehabilitate a culture gone horribly wrong.
Khosrowshahi’s tenure is already turning into an international apology tour. The latest mea culpa, of course, is that the company covered up a hack of 57 million user accounts in 2016. Hacks happen to the best of companies, alas. But failing to notify the affected account holders is grossly negligent. And paying the hackers $100,000 to keep quiet about it, according to Reuters, is simply unfathomable.
In his apology blog post, Khosrowshahi seems to have forgotten to mention the payment, which was also reported by Bloomberg.
“None of this should have happened, and I will not make excuses for it,” Khosrowshahi wrote. “While I can’t erase the past, I can commit on behalf of every Uber employee that we will learn from our mistakes. We are changing the way we do business, putting integrity at the core of every decision we make and working hard to earn the trust of our customers.”
Khosrowshahi fired the company’s chief security officer and a deputy. The Recorder reported that the deputy was in fact in-house lawyer Craig Clark. We wonder if new Uber general counsel Tony West has reported for duty yet? Welcome to the team, Tony! Otherwise, the executive suite remains a relatively empty place these days.
This latest scandal comes as Khosrowshahi is having to grovel before London authoritiesto get the company’s license restored there. Regulators there don’t seem to trust Uber after years of bad faith and bullying. Surprise! That lack of trust extends to countless other jurisdictions around the world that became fed up with the take-no-prisoners tactics of disgraced former CEO Travis Kalanick.
Kalanick, you’ll recall, was forced out of his own company following a massive internal investigation regarding the company’s culture of sexual harassment. And that investigation came as the company was being sued for allegedly stealing autonomous vehicle intellectual property from Google’s Waymo unit.
Oh, gee, what else? Is it unfair to dredge up things like an executive threatening a journalist? The Uber driver that raped a passenger in India? The Greyball technology the company used to dupe regulators? Booking fake rides to disrupt its competitor Lyft? Spying on passengers using its “God View” technology?
Uber can expect a colonoscopy from regulators over the latest scandal. But why should the company get any more chances at this point? The fact that investors have pumped billions of venture capital into this morality swamp isn’t really a justification for its existence. And neither is our addiction to heavily subsidized cab rides.
I’m sure the new CEO is sincere about being sorry. At this point, I think we’re all a bit sorry for anything we did to support Uber along the way. But now the rest of us have a duty to vote with our feet and wallets by walking away from Uber and leaving it to wither and fade away
Source : Venturebeat.com
from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2mVq4kv
via IFTTT
Letter To The Editor: TfL Threatened Me With Temporary Unemployment Over Late DBS Certificate, Unless I Paid More
Taxi Leaks has received this letter from GreenBadgeJohn (on Twitter). It details clearly the fact that Taxi drivers are currently being treated different to not only Private Hire Drivers, but especially Uber drivers, when applying for or renewing their licence.
John was charged an extra £13, having already paid the full amount for an enhanced DBS criminal records check, or was threatened with unemployment when his DBS was caught up in the system.
TFl unsuccessfully tried to deny how I was threatened with temporary unemployment unless I paid to join the (non mandatory) Update service because my CRB had not been duly processed due to high demands at that period and even though I had started the process within the prescribed 4 month advanced application period they require.
I was given one option once my old licence expired:
I had to attend TPH's office in southwark and sign a form to obtain a Temporary Measure Licence, but before doing so it was made a mandatory that I joined the "update service" costing a further £13 (although I had paid the full amount required to re-licence) ...."or I would not be licensed to continue working"
I contacted my appointed GLA member who duly emailed TFL about my issue and was emailed with all the facts I state above.
I find it disgusting how Uber has a completely different "arrangement" to me as a licensed taxi driver who has no prior criminal record and as this "record" has rolled over 10 times in 3 yearly stages over the years (not counting the 2 & 3/4 years knowledge) as opposed to new private hire drivers applying to TFL in their droves from places that may not be willing to divulge prior records due to filing inadequacies or from corrupted war torn regions who are given the freedom to continue to work unconditionally or until the dots of acceptability are presumably joined up somehow? (and that is another story)
Every Licensed London Taxi driver has a history.... 'The Knowledge'... which is a long time based characterisation of every applicant.... new Private hire drivers do not.
As we who have completed the knowledge process know it is more than just showing you can find your way around London as you are tested on characteristics over a long period of time which allows licensing authorities time to study suitability and measure character and fortitude and all on a time linked CRB system and creates a license of value for those knowledge students who have taken years to obtain and will truly value and would never wish to jeopardise.
Compare that to the overwhelming numbers of out of the blue private hire applicants who will try to make some kind of a living from being lost in a world capital city and dangerously gaze at a windscreen sat nav device and hold a no value license to work which is given to them for the payment of a fee.
There have always been serious implications as to how private hire drivers can honestly be vetted over a staggeringly short period of time-lapsed investigative study, but to now allow driver an non-investigated working period before potentially uncovering serious character faults and latterly barring them is a scandal and must stop before any further crimes are committed.
TFL have a duty of public care and must do their job properly as this scandal is truly astonishing and unchecked drivers with no history must not be allowed to hold any form of private hire license until satisfactory checking is completed.... no compromises.
Be Lucky
greenbadgejohn (on twitter)
I was given one option once my old licence expired:
I had to attend TPH's office in southwark and sign a form to obtain a Temporary Measure Licence, but before doing so it was made a mandatory that I joined the "update service" costing a further £13 (although I had paid the full amount required to re-licence) ...."or I would not be licensed to continue working"
I contacted my appointed GLA member who duly emailed TFL about my issue and was emailed with all the facts I state above.
I find it disgusting how Uber has a completely different "arrangement" to me as a licensed taxi driver who has no prior criminal record and as this "record" has rolled over 10 times in 3 yearly stages over the years (not counting the 2 & 3/4 years knowledge) as opposed to new private hire drivers applying to TFL in their droves from places that may not be willing to divulge prior records due to filing inadequacies or from corrupted war torn regions who are given the freedom to continue to work unconditionally or until the dots of acceptability are presumably joined up somehow? (and that is another story)
Every Licensed London Taxi driver has a history.... 'The Knowledge'... which is a long time based characterisation of every applicant.... new Private hire drivers do not.
As we who have completed the knowledge process know it is more than just showing you can find your way around London as you are tested on characteristics over a long period of time which allows licensing authorities time to study suitability and measure character and fortitude and all on a time linked CRB system and creates a license of value for those knowledge students who have taken years to obtain and will truly value and would never wish to jeopardise.
Compare that to the overwhelming numbers of out of the blue private hire applicants who will try to make some kind of a living from being lost in a world capital city and dangerously gaze at a windscreen sat nav device and hold a no value license to work which is given to them for the payment of a fee.
There have always been serious implications as to how private hire drivers can honestly be vetted over a staggeringly short period of time-lapsed investigative study, but to now allow driver an non-investigated working period before potentially uncovering serious character faults and latterly barring them is a scandal and must stop before any further crimes are committed.
TFL have a duty of public care and must do their job properly as this scandal is truly astonishing and unchecked drivers with no history must not be allowed to hold any form of private hire license until satisfactory checking is completed.... no compromises.
Be Lucky
greenbadgejohn (on twitter)
It appears that if you are a private hire driver, and in particular, if you are registered with Uber, then the application standards appear to have been relaxed, even though TfLTPH general manager Helen Chapman gives assurances when talking to the media, that all private hire drivers go through the same enhanced criminal record checks process as licensed Taxi drivers do.
But Helen statement doesn't appear to be factual, as we've since found out (by FOI request).
Only 2,642 private hire drivers, out of the 13,000 Uber drivers found to have fake DBS certificates back in January this year, have subsequently resubmitted genuine applications.
The question needs an answer:
Why have TfKTPH treated these Uber drivers -who failed to comply with regulation- different?
Why haven't the licenses of the 10,300 odd who never resubmitted not been suspended?
Is it really one rule for Taxi and Private hire Drivers, and a different rule for a Uber drivers?
from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2A57qd7
via IFTTT
Wednesday, 22 November 2017
FOI reveals Transport for London repeatedly renewed £2m consultancy contract over 7 years without getting rival bids
Transport for London has defended the repeated extension of a consultancy contract worth almost £2m over a seven year period without asking rivals to tender for the work.
In October 2010 the capital’s transport agency hired the contractor to provide a staff member who would “assist the TfL senior leadership team” during their work on the Horizon programme which was tasked to slash costs in TfL’s support functions.
The initial contract was worth £122,980 and covered “targeted senior executive leadership facilitation, support and coaching for the TfL leadership team, including the Commissioner and the Chief Officers.”
TfL says the work was awarded following “a search of the market,” however the relationship has been extended several times over the following seven years, each time without alternative suppliers being asked to tender.
Each of the renewals was approved following the production of a ‘single source request’ document which self-exempts public bodies from tendering contracts.
The first extension came in February 2011, just 4 months after the initial agreement was signed, with further extensions in August and October of the same year.
The document approving the second extension justifies the failure to openly tender the work on the grounds that other suppliers “would not have the existing knowledge of TfL, the Horizon programme, the expertise and familiarity or trusting relationship with the individual Directors in the Leadership team.”
In August 2012 an uncontested extension worth £250,000 was approved on the grounds that “a decision to put this activity out for tender would inevitably have postponed the delivery of Project Horizon”.
The document added that proceeding without the support of an external contractor “would have meant progressing Project Horizon without effectively organising or coordinating Chief Officer input, leading to a sub-optimal conclusion and/or delay to the project.”
Eleven months later TfL justified a decision not to put a further extension, worth £162,000, out to tender “as it may result in a loss of continuity in the development of individuals”.
The relevant approval document also states that the additional work being approved was “needed to provide the continuous support that is required by the Commissioner.”
An extension worth £175,500 was signed off in October 2014 to allow the contractor “to assist the Commissioner direct and develop an effective TfL leadership team and to support the team so that he can lead TfL effectively.”
It also justified the decision not to tender the work on the grounds that “it may result in a loss of continuity in the development of individuals”.
Further extensions followed July 2015, March 2016, October 2016, March 2017 and, most recently, in October 2017.
A freedom of information request shows that over the seven year period to October 2017 the contractor was paid £1.74m. The latest extension is worth a further £210,000.
The services provided span the terms of former TfL Commissioner Sir Peter Hendy and successor Mike Brown. TfL’s top post comes with a salary in excess of £300,000 and a host of in-house support staff.
Defending the consultancy contract, a TfL spokesperson said the contractor in question “has provided advice and support to the TfL leadership team for a number of major organisational change programmes to deliver a range of improvements and significant financial savings.
“The current programme is delivering £4bn of savings to 2021/22, reducing our operating costs for the first time in our history.”
However Liberal Democrat London Assembly member Caroline Pidgeon said the agency’s decision to repeatedly roll over the contract uncontested “for so many years raises some fundamental questions about TfL’s transparency, let alone its commitment to value for money.”
She added: “Contracts such as this should be open for examination and regularly put out to tender.”
The most recent renewals appear to undermine efforts by Mayor Sadiq Khan to slash costs within TfL in order to help fund his freeze fares and meet the challenges posed by the axing of TfL’s Government grants.
Last year Mr Khan ordered the agency to carry out “a fundamental review” of management layers, renegotiate all contracts, freeze recruitment “for all but the most essential roles” while “significantly cutting the most expensive of the existing circa 3,000 agency contractors.”
Commenting on the FOI’s revelations, Labour AM Tom Copley said: “We’ve had a commitment from the Mayor to reducing consultancy costs, TfL must now follow through.
“At a time when TfL are having to tighten their purse strings because the government are removing their operational grant, it begs the question whether this is value for money.”
Source : MayorWatch.co.uk
from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/2hJGkjj
via IFTTT