Call 01908 263263 or email us to make your booking now

  • Excellent value for money

  • Fixed prices, regardless of traffic or time of day

  • Your driver will be waiting for you at arrivals

  • Flights are tracked, so your driver won't come to the terminal until you land

  • Free waiting time if you are delayed coming through to arrivals all you pay is the charges for short stay car park


CYBERCABZ is a family run business EST in 2003 open 24 hours 365 days a year. We specialize in providing Heathrows airport taxi transfers transportation and local journeys from London Heathrow Airport to any location in the UK or any long distance journeys to anywhere ,including Europe.Our cars and vito mini busses are clean, polite and all come with a smart driver that are all insured and properly CRB checked and cleared so you are completely in safe hands on every part of your car journey .

Our Airport transfers fare price are so good and you are guaranteed to get a no fuss and a no hassle cheap inexpensive taxi service with us. So if you are coming or going to or from any of Heathrows terminals or other places nearby or anywhere in the UK we can provide you with a smart reliable friendly drivers to transfer you to where ever you’re going and also transfer you back from your destination with great prices and a an amazing deal on waiting around for you if you need to return same day. There is likelihood that you will need a Heathrow Airport cab service at one point or another.so therefore its necessary you look for a good service provider who can efficiently offer you taxi transport services. You can easily find such professionals at http://www.heathrowcabz.co.uk/

Do you Need Heathrows Airport taxi cars ?

London Heathrow airport transfers come in handy when you are late, and do not have enough time to drive. You will be amazed at how well the taxi drivers know many destinations. They can tell when a street will be busy and how they can avoid heavy traffic. They are also trained to offer their services with efficiently yet with your safety in mind.

It is possible that you are so tired after a long flight, and that all you need is to rest upon arrival in Heathrow. Still, it is possible that you have a lot of luggage that will make it even hard for you to rest an inch. Heathrow Airport transfers will relieve you of all your that transport and luggage stress especially if you make early bookings for the services.

When your business associates or long-time friends are about to arrive at the airport, you should just go for Heathrow airport taxi services. You can call a taxi agency and give them the details of the times and dates when your guests will be arriving. Your friends will to find a taxi waiting for them at the airport and that they just have to sit back and have a good time.

Sometimes you want to arrive at a destination in style. You may want to impress your business associates or family friends. Driving your old car or asking your friend to drop you to the airport during such times may not make much sense. Rather, you can go for Heathrow airport taxi services and arrive in style. You can choose a limousine or any other classy ride as offered by the taxi agencies.

Do not panic when your car breakdown in the middle of your ride to Heathrow airport. During such moments, you need not to worry on whether you will miss a flight or not. All you need to do is calling taxi service providers and notify them of your problem. Before you know it, a taxi will be on the stand by waiting to take you to the airport.

You may be surprised that you can get there earlier that you expected.During those nights when everyone has retired to sleep, Heathrow airport taxi companies are still operating. You can make quick arrangements for transfers and soon you will be sorted out. You can ask the drivers to make reservations for you or your loved ones and the drivers will be waiting for you at the airport or any other destination. You can even raise concerns about taxi services at that particular time and there will be someone on standby to address you.

Rules for Good Taxi Service Providers

Best service providers in Heathrow airport transfer services are guided by a code of conduct. It means that they must maintain certain ethical standards in service provision. Firstly, they will arrive on time so that you do not end up getting late. Secondly, they will keep communicating with you, and confirming about your transportation details such as time, whether you have luggage and the number of people to Heathrow airport transfer.

Thirdly, they will handle the whole service delivery professionally. This means that their language, dressing and driving will thrill you. Lastly, the cars are well maintained so that every client will arrive at their destination safely.

About paying for your Cab

People have a notion that the Heathrow airport taxi services are meant for certain class of people. This is far from the truth! You can afford to pay for the services since there are options to suit every budget.

The price paid for taxi services depend on:

•The type of car that you choose. Some cabs will be very expensive; since they have classy appeal and are comfortable enough for everyone. Big cars that accommodate a lot of people can also be expensive as opposed to smaller cars.

• The number of hours of service delivery. If you hire a vehicle for a whole day, you will pay more than for someone who hires it for a few hours.

• Period of service delivery. When you hire a cab during the night, you will be charged more than someone who hires it during the day.

• Negotiation skills. With sharp negotiation skills, it is possible to pay less for taxi services. You can state your price, and ask the taxi company to provide a service that suits that specific budget. You will be amazed to find out that Heathrow Airport Transfer you can still get comfortable rides yet at an affordable rate.

• Distance covered. It costs more for long distance cab services than for short distances. Logically, you will have to pay for the gas consumption during long distances travel.

It is important to book for Heathrow airport taxi services in advance. This ensures that you are picked at the right time. The bookings can be done online; which is convenient. You can also ask for quotes online so that you can budget well for the services.

OUR TAXI TRANSFERS ARE THE BEST AND 200% RELIABLE SO CALL 01908 263 263




Sunday, 24 January 2016

AGAIN....WE'VE ALL BEEN STITCHED UP : TfL's Card Payment Recommendations.

On Friday, representatives from the Licensed Taxi trade groups plus carefully selected trade Orgs (UTG) were invited to a meeting with TfL. At the meeting they were told how TfL intended to mandate "Card Payments In Taxis". 

Below are the recommendations.
TfL will implement after they have recieved the rubber stamp from the TfL board on "Demo Day", the 3rd of December.

Although the paper (released on the 21st) carries the headline "this paper will be considered in public", again this statement has been made under TfLs own warped sense of interpretation. The consultation is over, that it.

The LCDC have previously made a statement, via Twitter, that TfL do not negotiate. When these recommendations are approved by the board, and have no doubt they will be,  the system below WILL be implemented.


This paper will be considered in public 

1 Summary

  1. 1.1  The purpose of this paper is to update the Committee on mandating card payment acceptance in taxis.

  2. 1.2  This matter was discussed at Surface Transport Panel at its meeting on 22 October 2015.

2 Recommendation

2.1 The Committee is asked to note the paper and recommend that the Board agrees in respect of taxis:

(a) the following changes to come into effect on 2 April 2016:

(i) to remove the existing surcharge of up to 10 per cent of the fare payable or £1, whichever is greater, that passengers currently pay when paying by debit or credit card (a card);

(ii) mandate a maximum card payment transaction fee to drivers of 3 per cent of the total sum payable for TfL approved card payment devices. This will be included in the TfL guidelines for electronic payment devices; and

(iii)the minimum taxi fare (flagfall) to be increased by 20 pence from £2.40 to £2.60 per trip to compensate taxi drivers for costs associated with accepting card payments;

(b) the following changes to come into effect on 3 October 2016:

(i) to mandate card acceptance in all taxis and as, a minimum, devices should accept Chip and PIN, contactless and magnetic swipe payments;

(ii) to mandate acceptance of VISA and Mastercard payments as a minimum but drivers may also choose to accept other cards, such as American Express and Diners Club;

(iii)to mandate that card payment devices will be required to be fixed in the passenger compartment of the taxi so passengers stay in control of their card details at all times. [This could be fixed

 equipment or handheld devices affixed to a cradle, approved by TfL to ensure passenger safety. Web payment devices, such as Hailo’s new payment solution are also to be permitted to co-exist alongside fixed equipment so drivers can offer hirers choice of payment methods]; and

(iv)to approve clear signage, visible from outside the vehicle, to make clear that all taxis now accept card payments. [This will be linked with a marketing campaign by TfL to make clear all taxis accept card payments]; and

(c) to investigate the feasibility of the following change coming into effect from April 2018:

(i) to mandate that all card payment devices are linked to the taximeter, noting that the industry needs to work towards standard solutions that integrate card payment devices with the taximeter.

Below is a link to the whole release. 

Please read and take note that in a number of topics, TfL took more notice of "supposed potential Taxi users", than they did from actual users and licensed Taxi drivers.

It appears as with every TfL consultation we've been involved in, we've been stitched up AGAIN.

Again the second biggest trade org were excluded from the meeting.

And again this whole issue stinks of collusion. 


from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/1ngrKA9
via IFTTT

A40 Cash Cow Speed Trap Nets £100,000 A Month


The new average speed cameras on the A40, are raking in almost £100,000 per month from drivers on one of the capital’s busiest roads.

The “cheat-proof” traps have been placed at 32 sites on an11-mile stretch of the A40.

At present, they are catching almost 1,000 motorists a month. They've been deemed so successful, there are now plans to widen the scheme, despite angry claims that the cameras are simply “cash cow” for the Treasury. Road usering campaigners say the public were not adequately informed in advance.

The new system was activated at the end of October between the Polish War Memorial and the Westway flyover. The previously fixed speed cameras on seven sites, have now been removed.

By measuring average rates of travel, the new system prevents speeders evading detection by braking as they approach a camera.



'Cheat proof': The traps have been placed at 32 sites on an 11-mile stretch of the A40

A total of 958 offenders were caught in the first month after the devices went live.

Speeders are fined £100 and given at least three penalty points on their licence, depending on how fast they are clocked.

Transport for London said the cameras — which it is extending to the A2, A316 and A406 North Circular Road later this year — would cut deaths and serious injuries.

But it faced accusations of failing to give sufficient warning of the cameras’ presence amid suspicions they are a revenue-raiser for the Treasury, which receives proceeds from fines.

London Assembly member Murad Qureshi,  who raised concerns with Mayor Boris Johnson when the cameras were first proposed, told the Standard: “It does appear to be a cash-cow for the authorities — and done without much public notification.

“It’s not obvious the change has been made at all. I’ve no problem about getting drivers to kill their speed but this has been done behind their backs without telling them what is happening.”

Barrie Segal, who runs the parking tickets website AppealNow.com, said: “I hate speeders and if this scheme reduces road deaths that is very welcome — but if it’s done cynically to raise funds I would be rather concerned.”

A Freedom of Information request by the Evening Standard to the Metropolitan Police revealed that 1,303 “notices of intended prosecution” were issued between October 26 and December 30, including the 958 in November. 

Drivers were clocked at up to 90mph. The A40 has 40mph and 50mph speed limits. The elevated Westway section between North Wharf Road and Bramley Road attracted most fines — 305 over the first two months.

Average-speed cameras were introduced in London on the A13 in 2010 and halved road deaths or serious injuries in the subsequent 18 months.

Average-speed cameras will go live on the North Circular between Hanger Lane and Bounds Green Road and on the A316 between the M3 and Hogarth roundabout in “early summer”, then on the A2 from the Blackwall tunnel  to the Black Prince interchange in “late September”.

Source : Standard news FB.




from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/1Pe5zFv
via IFTTT

Saturday, 23 January 2016

Trouble Brews, As Taxis Confront Uber Picking Up At Airport.


On Thursday, Uber started transporting passengers from LAX, cutting into taxi drivers’ opportunities and prompting taxi drivers to slam the ride-sharing company for lax security procedures.

William Rouse, general manager of Yellow Cab of Los Angeles, the largest taxicab company in the city, told Southern California Public Radio, “They continue using a weak background check system that does not even have the possibility of considering convictions that are over seven years old. There’s no doubt that there are certain consumers who choose [ridesharing companies] in spite of their obvious risks.”

Taxi service has not declined at LAX; in fact, Rouse admitted that Yellow Cab pick-ups were 7% higher in January 2016 than in January 2015. The UCLA Labor Center has reported that although taxi service plunged 18% between 2013 and 2014 after Uber and rival ride-sharer Lyft arrived in Los Angeles in 2013, airport rides during the same period rose 15 percent. 

The Labor Center acknowledged, “Airports are one of the prized sites for earnings for taxi drivers.

Drivers are given access to the airport one day of the week known as their ‘airport day.’ Drivers typically earn more money due to longer fares, and they tend to work longer days.”

Uber’s website states that its vetting of its drivers are adequate, writing, “In the US, potential Uber driver-partners are required to undergo a screening process, which includes a driving and criminal history check that covers county, federal, and multi-state databases.”

Lyft started picking up passengers at LAX in late December, but its permit required the company to pay LAX at least $25,000 per month from $4 fees for each drop-off and pickup. Those funds are contributed to the airport’s general operating budget. Those same provisions now apply to Uber.




from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/1Kwcd4y
via IFTTT

Assembly Member Valerie Shawcross Openly Attacks George Osborne On FaceBook.


Boris doesn't deny at MQT, when asked that he was directly and personally lobbied  by George Osborne  in support of Uber. 

How does that work ?  - what is a Chancellor of the UK Exchequer doing lobbying personally for a global company that isn't a corporate taxpayer in the UK?  

It's not sustainable for UK democracy and public services  for our  government  to favour companies  who don't make a contribution to the coffers over local small enterprizes that do!   

The  UK  is  a good place to do business because it is a well run  and regulated business environment.

 But antiregulatory right wing ideologists in Government will destroy the UK's economic success by undermining our public services and regulated environment  through their active support of tax avoidance!

Source : Facebook January 21st 3pm 


from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/1WDqfrZ
via IFTTT

Friday, 22 January 2016

Uber gets a taxi brokerage licence despite controversy over ride-sharing


The city says Uber Canada is now operating as a legal taxi brokerage in Toronto despite continuing to illegally connect riders to unlicensed drivers.

On Friday morning, Uber announced it had received its taxi brokerage licence after applying in May amid ongoing controversy about bringing the company under the same city rules as traditional taxi companies.

Those within the taxi industry criticized that move Friday, saying little has changed and Uber still isn’t following the rules.

Uber, which links riders with available cabs through its UberTaxi service on a mobile app, also offers cheaper rides through unlicensed drivers using the UberX service on the same app.

“This is another step towards our participation in a comprehensive regulatory solution that includes ride-sharing,” Uber Canada spokesperson Susie Heath said in a statement. “We will continue to work with the City of Toronto towards new regulations for ride-sharing, which are expected in the coming months.”

Tracey Cook, the head of the city’s municipal licensing and standards, drew a line between the two services, saying she considers UberTaxi now operating as a legal taxi brokerage.

“For the purposes of dispatching or connecting licensed City of Toronto taxi cabs under UberTaxi that is lawfully permitted under the taxi cab brokerage license,” Cook said, while at the same time confirming UberX is still operating illegally.

According to the city’s rules, taxi brokerages are prohibited from connecting riders to unlicensed cabs. Any dispatch company breaking those rules could be fined $50,000 with an additional $25,000 levied against each company director.

Cook said they continue to enforce the current bylaws against UberX drivers and the company, with 120 bylaw charges currently before the courts and another 180 to 210 charges being processed. 

Licensing staff are also working on new regulations to bring UberX under city rules, which are expected to be put forward in April.

This change follows months of controversy after the city took Uber to court over claims they were operating illegally in the city — a fight that is playing out across North America.

After a Superior Court judge ruled last year that Uber was operating outside the legal framework and not breaking city rules, council voted to update the bylaws to bring those Uber services using licensed taxis and limos into the city’s jurisdiction.

The brokerage licence, which costs $400 to get and less to renew each year, puts Uber in the same league with major cab companies such as Beck — one of several groups vocally opposing the service they say is taking away drivers’ livelihoods.

On Friday, Beck spokesperson Kristine Hubbard said she’s glad for the acknowledgement that Uber is a taxi dispatcher just like her company, even as Uber continues to label itself a “ridesharing” service. 

But Hubbard said she’s stunned by the city’s position.

“It is irresponsible at best that we would see our regulatory body issue a licence to a company that has constantly broken the rules, constantly undermined authority and has no respect for our legal system here,” Hubbard said.

“If the Beck Taxi app was to connect today someone to an unlicensed vehicle we would be charged against our brokerage licence.”

Hubbard questioned why the same would not apply to Uber.

Councillor Jim Karygiannis — who has been firmly aligned with the taxi industry since arriving at city hall — said he plans to bring a motion to the licensing committee, which is meeting Friday, asking the city to seek a court injunction against UberX.



from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/1S9WqPj
via IFTTT

Perhaps We Should Call For Our Licensing Authority To Be Dissolved Or Replaced?




AUDIT CALLS FOR TAXICAB AUTHORITY BE DISSOLVED OR REPLACED

CARSON CITY — State auditors released a scathing report Tuesday on the Taxicab Authority that regulates the industry in Southern Nevada, faulting the agency for excessive fees that cost riders tens of millions of dollars and an overbearing board that exceeds its statutory role and could expose the state to liabilities.

The internal audit recommended the Taxicab Authority be dissolved. It suggested Clark County or the Nevada Transportation Authority, which regulates ride-sharing companies, taxis and limos throughout the rest of the state, assume Las Vegas-area oversight as well.

"I don't know if I've ever seen a more critical audit in my experience," said Gov. Brian Sandoval, who chairs the Executive Branch Audit Committee.

The authority in fiscal year 2015 had funding revenue of $11 million and expenditures of about $6.1 million, the audit said.

Among other things, the audit criticized excessive credit card fees and a fuel surcharge approved in July when gasoline prices were declining.

The 20-cent-per-mile fuel surcharge equates to about $27 million annually, which goes to the industry, auditors said.

A month after the surcharge was approved by the board, it was reallocated, with 8 cents made part of the permanent fare structure.

"We noted there was unfortunately little documentation to support not only the surcharge, but the reallocation that occurred after that," said Warren Lowman, executive branch audit manager.

The audit noted gasoline prices dropped about 10 cents per gallon over the summer of 2015 and the number of visitors to Las Vegas was up 2 percent over the same time the year before. Additionally, passenger traffic at McCarran Airport was up more than 7.2 percent, resulting in a 1.2 percent increase in taxicab trips.

"In summary, industry fuel costs were down and revenues were up," the audit said.

The fuel surcharge was implemented soon after ride-hailing companies such as Uber and Lyft were given authority by state lawamkers to operate in Nevada

Credit card charge criticized

Besides the fuel charge, the audit said a $3 fee for using credit cards "exceeds all the operational costs to the industry" for providing the convenience and amounts to an "unsupported revenue" for the industry of $14.2 million to $20.3 million annually.

It recommended reducing the fee to 90 cents or eliminating it all together, noting that cabs in Clark County are the only ones to charge for using a credit card.

About 25 percent of cab trips in the county are paid by credit card, and the fee accounts for 17 percent of an average fare for a 5-mile trip, the audit said.

According to statistics reported by the Taxicab Authority this month, annual revenue hit a record $425.1 million for Clark County's 16 cab companies and was up 4.1 percent over the previous year.

Besides fees, the audit said the taxicab board routinely adheres to industry positions and oversteps its authority to dictate administrative functions.

"Board decisions have minimized authority staff work, relied on taxicab industry representation, changed established procedures, and countered decisions made for the welfare and safety of the public," the audit said.

It cited a board decision to overrule the agency's denial of permits for two drivers who had criminal records.

"The administrator considered the evidence and concluded applicants violated … criteria for sexual and drug offenses," the audit said. "The board concluded on appeal that extenuating circumstances and conditional privileges were sufficient deterrent and issued a drivers permit to both applicants."

Auditors said, "The board's appellate decisions of the administrator's conclusions on fitness for driver's permits may expose the state to liabilities."

Inspection intervention

The board also intervened in the administrator's inspection schedule "at the expense of one company over another" on New Year's Eve in 2014, the report said.

"As a result … the owner who failed to follow procedures but was helped by the board obtained an advantage over other taxicab owners who followed procedures during the holiday season but were unable to put taxicabs in service," the audit said.

The audit was advisory only and some of the recommended changes, such as to fees and credit card charges, require approval by the Taxicab Authority board before they can go into effect. Dismantling the agency would need legislative approval in 2017.

Bruce Breslow, director of the Department of Business and Industry, and Ron Grogan, authority administrator, accepted the audit recommendations. No board members attended Tuesday's meeting, though they were notified of it, Breslow said.

Breslow said the board's chairwoman, Ileana Drobkin, told him auditors have no authority over her regulatory board and she wouldn't attend.

"Technically she's correct. They're not bound by this," Sandoval said. But he said he would have liked to have heard from board members.

He added, "I just wanted to make it clear the board members were notified of the time and date,"

Drobkin did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.

Grogan said the taxicab board is expected to discuss the audit at its next meeting.



from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/1ZR5m26
via IFTTT

Thursday, 21 January 2016

LTC Black Cabs Not Unique, High Court Rules, Paving Way For MetroCab


A high court judge has ruled that one of London’s most famous sights, the black cab, is not that unique after all, concluding that they are “devoid of inherent distinctive character”.

Mr Justice Arnold said that the taxis are “merely a variation of the typical shape of a car” and ruled that trademarks exclusively relating to its shape should be deemed invalid.

He made the judgment on Wednesday after a legal row between the manufacturer of the traditional London taxi and the group behind a new eco-friendly cab. The ruling paves the way for the “green” taxis to hit London’s roads over the next few years.

Arnold said: “In my view the CTM [the design of the black cab] would have been perceived by the average consumer of taxis as merely a variation of the typical shape of a taxi.

“I should make it clear that, if one considers the question from the perspective of the average consumer of cars, in my view the CTM would be perceived as merely a variation of the typical shape of a car.”

The two trademarks in question during the hearing related to three-dimensional drawings of the exterior of the typical black cab.

The London Taxi Company, which is owned by Chinese group Geely, had claimed the new Metrocab was “substantially copied” from the design of the TX4, the latest version of the hackney carriage. 

The Metrocab is a hybrid-powered taxi developed by Frazer-Nash Research and Ecotive. The zero-emissions vehicle uses an electric battery and a petrol engine, which extends the range of the battery.

The judge dismissed fraud allegations by the London Taxi Company as “deeply implausible” and said that even if the trademarks were valid then the Metrocab was not simply a copy of the TX4.

The Metrocab is scheduled to go into bulk production later this year and is at the forefront of a drive by Boris Johnson, the mayor of London, to ensure that all new taxis are zero-emission by 2018. Geely has pledged to invest £250m into a new facility in Coventry to produce greener versions of its black cab.

Peter Johansen, the chief executive of the London Taxi Company, said: “We are understandably disappointed by the judge’s ruling. We will review the ruling to determine our way forward.”

The London Taxi Company has been in operation since 1899, with black cabs going on to become one of the symbols of London.

A fleet of black cabs featured in the closing ceremony for the London 2012 Olympics, and last year it was voted as London’s favourite transport “design icon” in a survey conducted by Transport for London (TfL) and the London TransportMuseum.

It represents another blow for the traditional London taxi as it battles against the rise of Uber, the car-hire smartphone app.

TfL announced on Wednesday that after conducting a consultation it would not be introducing proposed new regulations that would have affected Uber, including forcing minicab operators to provide booking confirmation details to the passenger at least five minutes before a journey starts.

The high court decision follows a similar ruling on Wednesday about KitKat, with the same judge deciding that Nestlé could not trademark the shape of its chocolate bar.

Source : The Guardian


from Taxi Leaks http://ift.tt/1QnA5xM
via IFTTT